mirror of git://git.suckless.org/dwm
pretty printing bugs a bit
This commit is contained in:
parent
a88e0373ef
commit
427053f8d1
21
BUGS
21
BUGS
|
@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
|
||||
18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
|
||||
18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
|
||||
|
||||
reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
|
||||
> (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
|
||||
|
@ -20,15 +23,18 @@ reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
|
|||
> + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
|
||||
> + return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> another corner case:
|
||||
|
||||
a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
|
||||
on the main monitor
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
yet another corner case:
|
||||
open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
|
||||
|
@ -36,7 +42,6 @@ pointer there
|
|||
if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
|
||||
terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Donald Allen reported this:
|
||||
|
@ -57,3 +62,15 @@ privmail from 2 other people within one week, really strange).
|
|||
The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip
|
||||
dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I
|
||||
will address this issue shortly with a real fix.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
|
||||
|
||||
> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
|
||||
> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
|
||||
> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter.
|
||||
|
||||
Patching SDL, bugging them?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue